António José (ajose) wrote,
António José
ajose

  • Mood:

Ok, I know now why it doesn't work!...

Ok, I know now why it doesn't work!

I've only defined execution semantics for the word and the necessary compilation semantics is neither the default one (has the word has a parameter following it) nor have I defined one specific to it.

So, now, I have 2 options.

Or I see how to define the right compilation semantics (and I hope it wont take to long) or if it does, I'll just put the necessary code inline where it is necessary instead of calling a word, which will have been define before, thus needing it's compilation semantics, and leave this "research" work for latter.

Ok, back to programming mode.....
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments